Taking Every Thought Captive

Got Life?
Get Life!
Our Ministry
What We Do
Our Beliefs
What We Believe
Our Staff
Massimo Lorenzini
Jay Wegter
Articles
Abortion
Apologetics
Art
Assurance
Atonement
Bible Study
Book Reviews
Children
Church
Conversion
Christian Living
Creationism
Cults
Da Vinci Code
Depravity
Discipleship
Doctrines of Grace
Environmentalism
Ethics
Evangelism
Exodus
Gospel of Mark
History
Homosexuality
Israel
Jeremiah
Law of God
Manhood
Marriage
Missions
Paul
Perseverance/Security
Pornography
Postmodernism
Prayer
Presuppositionalism
Problem of Evil
Proverbs
Repentance
Revival/Spiritual Renewal
Roman Catholicism
Salvation
Sanctification
Satan
Scripture Memory
Sin
Spiritual Disciplines
Suffering
Suicide
Theology
Tolerance
Women
Worldview
What's New?
New Articles and Ministry News
Contact Us
Contact Info
Resources
Audio & Print Resources
Bookstore
Order Books Here
Search
Search Our Site
Links
Other Helpful Websites

Fueling Faith
Massimo's Blog

Personal Evangelism Training
Witnessing Without Fear

The Value of Catechism
Featured Article

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More
Support this Site

Personal Evangelism Training Manual

Purchase Here to Support This Ministry

Purchase Here to Support This Ministry

Purchase Here to Support This Ministry

Purchase Here to Support This Ministry
Featured Books




Frontline Ministries - The Gaia Hypothesis

The Gaia Hypothesis

D. Massimiliano Lorenzini


In James Lovelock's article "Rethinking Life on Earth: The Sum: Gaia Takes Flight"1 he sets forth his hypothesis of the Earth being a superorganism which he has named the Gaia Hypothesis. The word Gaia comes from the name of the ancient Greek goddess of the Earth.

James Lovelock, a physicist, developed this theory in the late 1960's and early 1970's. In 1973 he and biology professor Lynn Margulis collaborated to define the Gaia Hypothesis. They said, "The notion of the biosphere as an adaptive control system able to maintain the Earth in homoestasis, we are calling the Gaia Hypothesis."2

Mr. Lovelock developed this hypothesis as a result of questions he was asking like, "Could there possibly be an active climate control system on the Earth?...Might climate also be actively regulated in the long term?"3

Gaia, or geophysiology (a term he offered as an alternative), says that life influences the environment and life is influenced by and adapts to the environment. His point behind Gaia is that the Earth will eliminate those organisms that interfere with the environment by changing to a different homeostasis that would be inhospitable to those interfering organisms. The organisms he has in mind are humans.

In an article entitled "The Parts: Power to the Protoctists"4 Lynn Margulis refutes the concept of a two kingdom system of life -- plants and animals. She argues that all life on Earth derived from common ancestors, namely bacteria.

She says that all life not only derived from bacteria but that bacteria sustains all life today. She goes on to say that all life is equally important because organisms can be looked upon as communities of bacteria. She also questions the uniqueness of human intelligent consciousness.

These concepts that Lovelock and Margulis offer seem to suggest that man is behaving like a disease on Earth that Gaia, or the Earth system, must rid itself from as a body's immune system fights a virus. It further suggests that unless man changes to live in harmony with the current homeostasis Gaia will eliminate him by changing to a different homeostasis.

This concept gives an important reason to refrain from disrupting the biosphere from a motive of pure self-interest -- our survival. This concept declares that if we wish to survive as a species we must all become environmentalists.

Personally, I find the idea of Earth having an active and regulating climate control system hard to grasp. If Gaia is true, it is a highly complex system that is difficult for me to fully comprehend with my limited knowledge of the sciences.

I am troubled that New Agers and goddess worshipers find Gaia so appealing. It makes me wonder if the Gaia Hypothesis was developed to create an acceptable world view of the Earth rather than being a purely scientific discovery.

I see the implications of the Gaia Hypothesis leading to greater acceptability of animism and monism which I, as a Christian, reject as dangerous false doctrines. I would prefer that the Gaia Hypothesis would have become known as geophysiology rather than Gaia, the Greek goddess of the Earth.

1 Lovelock, James (September/October 1992) Rethinking Life on Earth: The Sum: Gaia Takes Flight. James Lovelock. Earthwatch.
2 ibid.
3 ibid.
4 Margulis, Lynn (September/Ocotober 1992) Rethinking Life on Earth: Power to the Protoctists. Earthwatch.


Print Friendly Version


Site visits since January 2006




Copyright © 2002-2008 D. Massimiliano Lorenzini. Permission granted to photocopy for not-for-sale reproduction in exact form, including copyright. All other uses require written permission.
Write . This publication may be downloaded from our web site at www.frontlinemin.org.

For questions or comments about this site, contact